A complaint against Google in 2014 revived the debate on the controversial practices of email-scanning company. Represented by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), two of the nine plaintiffs of the suit accusing Google of data mining student emails sent and received using Google Apps for Education on Chromebooks.
They argue that Google violated the laws on student privacy by using email scanning to compile secrets student profiles and target them with ads. The plaintiffs are seeking class certification to recover damages for all Gmail users subject to the allegedly unlawful practice
The prosecution raises concerning questions about the adequacy of Google's privacy policies whole, but the most difficult question is whether Google Chromebooks. - Laptops based affordable web that run Google Apps for Education - the compromise cybersecurity students. Admissions sworn Google in the lawsuit have many wondering if Chromebooks are really just poking a wolf in sheep's clothing, jeopardize the privacy of millions of users worldwide. Read on for answers to this question, as well as details on the trial
The argument of the applicants :. Devices Google Apps and violate privacy laws for education
The main objective of the recent trial of Google Gmail privacy practices, but two of the complainants are students in schools that have adopted Google Apps for Education. Students say their universities need them to use Gmail when schools began to use Apps for Education.
Used by 30 million students, teachers and administrators around the world, Google Apps for Education is a cloud-based productivity suite and the foundation for Google's Chromebook. The complainants allege that Google violated the Family Educational Rights Act and privacy by scanning their Gmail accounts.
Synopsis extraction practices data Google
Google's practice of scanning emails Gmail general users to target advertising campaigns are not exactly a secret. Most consumers know about this exploration data and consent to it, though implicitly, when they sign up for a Gmail account. The problem is that when the plaintiffs sued Google has been engaged in the same data mining practices with student emails -. Students required to use the service as part of applications for education and who has not consented
You might wonder how Google could get away with this face strict regulations on privacy of education. The company essentially found a loophole by disabling ads in applications for education by default, but administrators can activate if they so wished. However, student plaintiffs allege that although Google does not publish in applications for education, it still uses the data from these applications to advertise through other channels
Defense Google :. Email Scanning a non-commercial uses
In response, Google concedes that scans incoming and outgoing emails of students and other users of Apps for Education, but he insists that he does not use the information thereof to advertise unless customers agree.
email from Google scanning software can not be turned off, though, even if the applications for education users withdraw advertisements. The company defends the practice by emphasizing its non-commercial purposes, including spell checking, protection against viruses, and prioritize e-mails.
What is worrying is that Google will not say if it uses email to the student data mining applications to build profiles for educational users surreptitiously. The silence of the company validates the assertion of the complainants that Google could use the data to provide targeted advertising in services outside applications for education, including Google+, YouTube and Google search.
The only Google's response to these claims is that the same privacy policy applicable to the general Gmail users also applies to applications for users of education, which means that the company has permission users scan and process emails.
Google changed Some advertising policies, but they are all Chromebooks Safer?
After experiencing public reaction to the lawsuit, Google ads permanently disabled in applications for education, whether directors have agreed to them. Privacy advocates argue, however, that Google is a day late and a dollar short when it comes to protecting user privacy. Social media lawyer Bradley Shear believes that disabling your applications is just a superficial attempt sense by Google to appease the skeptics.
"Does Google also disable scanning and behavioral advertising duties for its other services such as YouTube a school setting," Shear supported. "Does Google also change its policies and Android Chromebook to better protect the privacy of students? Does Google change its terms of service and privacy policies that govern all its training offers? Is -what Google revise its school contracts to reflect this ad? "
shear point is that Google still Chromebooks data mining, and is still free to use this information to tell users to Chromebooks in other services. For this reason, speculation that Chromebooks are really just sophisticated listening devices persists
The Chromebook.? A gold mine for Spies and Hackers
The point of sale Chromebook is its approach to the cloud, and is in it its Achilles heel. Chromebooks have very little internal storage, so almost everything that users put on them is stored in the cloud. Emails, documents, images, etc. are safely stored on an internal hard drive; they exist only on Google's servers.
Users then have very little control over who sees their personal data, which is especially troubling when you consider that the data remains with what some consider the largest advertising company in the world.
Google's response to public skepticism security Chromebook is that it is "safer computer, one can buy." The company insists that its data mining practices fully transparent and that the Chromebook is as close to impregnable to hackers that computers can get. What consumers believe the company online Google remains to be seen.
recent revelations about the collection and use information unsavory students Google inspired fear in the hearts of many Chromebook users about their privacy. in defense of Google, anyone who uses Gmail is subject to these practices, but the unbridled control Google Chromebooks leaves users vulnerable to exploitation mining. it is unclear how exactly Google knows and what he does with his intelligence, so that consumers with privacy concerns are probably better opt for a laptop of different brand until we know more.
0 Komentar